Got Famous: Two GOP Senators Resign Posts Over Trump

Two Alaska senators handed liberals exactly what they wanted — a fractured GOP — by voluntarily resigning from leadership posts in the state Republican party this weekend over their unified refusal to back presidential candidate Donald Trump.

One of the senators, Lisa Murkowski, claimed that the video published last week showing Trump making lewd remarks about women in 2005 was so offensive that it “forfeited” his right to be the party’s nominee. According to Newsmax, she had not previously endorsed the GOP candidate.

The other state leader, Sen. Dan Sullivan, had backed Trump but withdrew his support after the video’s publication, vowing instead to support the GOP candidate’s running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, for president.

The good news for both Murkowski and Sullivan was that, according to state GOP chairman Tuckerman Babcock, their positions within the party were locked in place, meaning they will be restored immediately after the election.
The bad news for Murkowski, however, was that she was up for re-election against a fierce opponent, Republican-turned-Libertarian Joe Miller, who felt no compunction about throwing her to the dogs.

Speaking with reporters, he pointed out that she had a habit of not supporting GOP nominees. In 2010, for instance, she refused to support him after he trounced her in the 2010 GOP primary. Moreover, regarding Trump, Miller noted that he was clearly “repentant,” as was evident from the apology statement he released on Saturday.

The one thing Murkowski had going for her was that the state GOP remained committed to her, though it also still backed Trump.

What she had going against her, however, was devastating: She was known throughout the state as a RINO, a Republican In Name Only.

Gee, I wonder why …

Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about these two GOP senators resigning from their party posts over Trump’s lewd comments!

Hillary’s Childhood Home Uncovered in Picture

If you will recall during the first presidential debate, Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton invoked her “working class” father who struggled to provide an average life for his family in their perfectly average “middle class” home.

But based on excerpts from Clinton’s many paid speech transcripts, brought to us via WikiLeaks, we find that Clinton herself has admitted behind closed doors that she feels “far removed” from the middle class — one of many less-than-truthful things we have discovered about her.

Now we have found out that she has been just a bit dishonest about her “middle class” upbringing, specifically the average home she claimed to have grown up in, according to Silence is Consent.

It turns out that Clinton’s “middle class” home was actually located in the rather affluent Park Ridge suburb of Chicago. The brick-sided, two-story, 2,500 square foot home is now valued at about $650,000, according to Zillow, just a tad bit outside the reach of those Americans truly classified as “middle class.”


It is worth noting that, during the 1950’s when Clinton was a child of a “struggling working class family,” the actual average middle class home was only about 1,000 square feet in size, making her childhood home more than two-and-a-half times as big as those lived in by the people she purports to relate with.

And let us not forget the private schools and Ivy League colleges she attended, not particularly known for being accessible to “struggling working class” kids.

If Hillary Clinton was once part of the “middle class,” it was the absolute upper echelons of that class, and she certainly didn’t stay there for long.

This is just further proof of how untrustworthy Hillary Clinton is. She will happily lie about something as innocuous as her childhood home and better-than-average upbringing if she thinks it means another credulous American or three will vote for her.

Don’t be that guy.

Please share this on Facebook and Twitter to help spread the word that Hillary Clinton did not grow up in a “middle class” home as she has claimed.

What do you think of Hillary Clinton’s “middle class” childhood home? Scroll down to comment below!

Huge: Trump Promises to Investigate Hillary Once He’s in Office

At the second presidential debate, one of Republican nominee Donald Trump’s most well-received lines was when he promised to launch an investigation of Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton if he were elected.

Trump vowed to put a special prosecutor on the case so Clinton could finally be brought to justice. On the campaign trail Trump doubled down on his remarks, and has expanded the list of people he would investigate,The Washington Times reported.

At a rally in Ocala, Florida, on Wednesday, Trump stated that he would investigate the Justice Department and the FBI to make sure those who were responsible for letting Clinton go were brought to justice.

“We have to investigate the investigation. We’ve never had a case like this,” Trump stated.

Trump could never put all these people on trial by himself — that’s not how a democracy works — but he could order the FBI and DOJ to investigate those involved in the decision not to prosecute Clinton, to see if any wrongdoing occurred along the way. “This is the most heinous, the most serious thing that I have ever seen with justice in the history of the United States. We have a person that has committed crimes that is now running for the presidency,” Trump exclaimed to the crowd.

Several polls have shown that a majority of Americans do believe that Clinton should have been charged over her use of a private email server, which is why Trump’s remarks are going over so well.

If Clinton becomes president it is almost certain that she will destroy all evidence that could be found against her, meaning that she will once again escape justice, perhaps permanently this time.

If Trump is elected, the Justice Department will actually get back to its job of prosecuting criminals and no longer turn a blind eye to politicians who happen to be well-connected.

Share this on Facebook and Twitter and let us know how you think Trump should go about investigating Clinton’s corruption.

You Won’t Believe what “Majority” Of FBI Agents On Hillary Investigation REALLY Wanted

The FBI’s decision not to recommend prosecution of Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton for her mishandling of classified information was not acceptable to lower-ranking members of the agency or of the Justice Department. According to The Daily Caller:

“No trial level attorney agreed, no agent working the case agreed, with the decision not to prosecute — it was a top-down decision,” a source whose identity was not revealed told Fox News.

A high-ranking official with the agency also said it was “unanimous” that they wanted Clinton’s security clearance revoked.

“It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should be prosecuted,” the official told Fox News. “We were floored while listening to the FBI briefing because Comey laid it all out, and then said ‘but we are doing nothing,’ which made no sense to us.”

The agent said Comey’s announcement on July 5 left members of the investigative team disgusted — to say nothing of the millions of citizens who could see that Clinton had committed several serious crimes.

Former judge Andrew Napolitano told Fox that he knew many law enforcement agents who were involved with the investigation had similar beliefs.

“It is well known that the FBI agents on the ground, the human beings who did the investigative work, had built an extremely strong case against Hillary Clinton and were furious when the case did not move forward,” the judge said. “They believe the decision not to prosecute came from the White House.”

Last week retired special agent Dennis V. Hughes, the first chief of the FBI’s computer investigations unit, claimed that the FBI had politicized itself with the decision and ruined its reputation by doing so. Retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello said Comey “single-handedly ruined the reputation of the organization.”

It’s hard not to agree with this assertion.

You won’t catch the mainstream media focusing on this information because it indicates that something suspicious was going on during the Clinton investigation — which would make Clinton look bad, and the liberal media simply won’t have any part of that.

Share this story on Facebook and Twitter to weigh in on what these officials are saying about the FBI’s decision to let Hillary Clinton off the hook.

Hacked Email Shows Why Exactly Hillary Avoided The Press For So Long

Over the past few days WikiLeaks has released a steady stream of hacked emails from Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta.

According to  The Daily Caller, these emails have revealed a lot about the inner workings of the Clinton campaign, as well as how duplicitous Clinton actually is. One of the emails in the batch released on Wednesday revealed to the American people why Clinton went for so long without a news conference.

Clinton’s infamous 275-day stretch without a press conference was in fact a deliberate strategy on the part of Clinton’s aides, in particular Huma Abedin, an email released by WikiLeaks showed.

“Can we survive not answering questions from press at message events. Her dinkins speech and immigration message broke through because we didn’t take questions. Her community banks message got lost because she answered questions about the foundation and emails,” Abedin wrote in an email to Podesta in May 2015.

Podesta didn’t seem to agree with this strategy. He called it “suicidal” and suggested that the campaign needed to “let the steam out of the pressure cooker” somehow.

“Not suggesting no q and a at all,” Abedin wrote back. “Maybe just having a straight message event and take questions from real people.”

While the liberal media may have fawned over Clinton, clearly she didn’t reciprocate the love. Her campaign, undoubtedly with her blessing, deliberately prevented her from having any news conferences so she wouldn’t have to answer tough questions.


This isn’t what freedom is all about. A real democratic leader would let reporters ask as many annoying questions as they wanted, because having a free press is the cornerstone of any democracy.

Even Republican nominee Donald Trump lets the news media ask him all sorts of insane questions because he understands what freedom is all about.

The liberal media seriously need to reconsider whether they want to elect someone who will go to extreme lengths to avoid being transparent. They’ve been Hillary Clinton’s buddies, but she’s not necessarily theirs.

Share this on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about Hillary Clinton’s relationship with the news media.