Army Gen. David Petraeus Finally Comes Forward With a Bone-Chilling Statements about Obama and ISIS

In an op-ed published Sunday in The Washington Post, retired Army Gen. David Petraeus, one-time CIA director and former commander of American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, said that Barack Obama’s failures in Iraq could lead to “ISIS 3.0.”

Petraeus implicitly criticized Obama’s policies in the Middle East, saying that American forces “obviously lack the authority, remit and sheer numbers” that they did during the Bush administration.

While acknowledging that U.S. support of Iraqi forces had made some difference in the conflict — most notably successes in the Islamic State stronghold of Mosul — he said the sectarian challenges created could plunge recaptured cities into Islamist violence and give birth to a new, more potent strain of the Islamic State group. He wrote:

“There is no question that the Islamic State will be defeated in Mosul; the real question is what comes afterward. Can the post-Islamic State effort resolve the squabbling likely to arise over numerous issues and bring lasting stability to one of Iraq’s most diverse and challenging provinces? Failure to do so could lead to ISIS 3.0.”

Petraeus recounted his experience leading the 101st Airborne when they came into Mosul during the occupation of Iraq back in 2003. He said that their “first task, once a degree of order had been restored, was to determine how to establish governance.”

That was difficult in a place where sectarian squabbles, numerous militias and decades of built-up acrimony existed. Back then, of course, they had the ability to control this through American occupation forces, whereas Obama has been reluctant to even consider the idea of using American influence to steer political elements within Iraq towards a peaceful solution.

“U.S. forces today obviously lack the authority, remit and sheer numbers of the U.S. elements in Iraq in 2003. They also do not have the mandate that we had in the early days. But the enabling forces that the U.S.-led coalition has provided for Iraqi elements over the past year — intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance assets, advisers, logistical elements, and precision strike platforms, in particular — have been instrumental in the successes enjoyed by the Iraqis in Ramadi, Fallujah, Tikrit, Baiji, Qayyarah and a host of other battle sites.”

However, he wrote that “the most significant challenge in Mosul will not be to defeat the Islamic State; rather, it will be the task we faced there in 2003: to ensure post-conflict security, reconstruction and, above all, governance that is representative of and responsive to the people”

Petraeus concluded that if and when the Islamic State group is defeated in Iraq, America “will have considerable influence over the resolution of the issues. It will have to exercise that influence.” That’s a not entirely subtle jab at President Obama, who has been relatively content to sit on the sidelines and let the people of Iraq work things out.

Keep in mind that Petraeus is one of the people who knows best the type of challenges that exist in Iraq, and the kind of situation that could foment an insurgency. The fact that he’s talking about the possibility of an Islamic State 3.0 is a deeply disturbing one. It’s also a sign that we need to consider the possibility when we go to the polls this November, lest we get another four years of absent leadership when it comes to terrorism.
Please like and share on Facebook and Twitter if you agree Obama’s policies in Iraq are a failure.

Blackwater Founder ELABORATES Hillary’s Connection to ISIS Success

Blackwater founder Eric Prince had words to say about Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton’s ability to lead an effective campaign against the Islamic State group when he was interviewed on the Sirius XM radio show, Brietbart News Daily. During the interview with host Stephen K. Bannon, Prince stated that:

Can’t imagine a Hillary Clinton administration ending the ISIS scourge.

He thinks that Hillary has what it takes and her inability to deal with the group would be a big part of its success. But Prince had a three-point plan of his own to deal with the terrorist thugs:

One, you have to take away any claim they have to a caliphate. That means destroying any conventional force they have in Iraq or Syria,

He then emphasized that he did not mean putting American boots on the ground, but sponsoring, and training the local forces. The second point – destroy the enemy’s funding with something called “Phoenix Program”
The objective of this program is to neutralize:

The funders of Islamic terror and that would even be the wealthy radical Islamist billionaires funding it from the Middle East, and any of the other illicit activities they’re in.

Thirdly, he said we have to destroy them on the internet. He elaborated this point:
That means with a very capable IT program to dig in and find where these jihadist sites are being hosted, where they’re being issued from, and you go and find and finish them at the Internet server level and destroy their ability to communicate, even on the Web.

Lastly, he said:

I’m willing to bet that whoever GOP nominee Donald Trump brings on board to help deal with the Islamic State group will know as much. I’m not as confident about Hillary.

Tell what you think about his comments? Share the story.