Obama Spews Hate Against Republicans In a Way Nobody Imagined

It is no secret that throughout his time as the President of the US, Barrack Obama has spent considerably more time speaking against the Republicans than doing something about the enemies of this country.

At least, if he did the latter, our country would have been in a much better position compared to the insecure, financially unstable place it is now.

But he has his priorities set. And the top priority is to speak up against Republicans whenever he gets a chance.
During an interview with the New York Magazine, Obama spilled the latest words of hate against the Rightists, when he spoke about where he thought Donald Trump, the Republican presidential candidate came from.

The Hill reported that during the interview, he complained that the Republicans in the congress are more concerned about being held accountable for their actions by their constituents.

“But if they think they’re going to lose seats or that they’re going to lose their own seat because the social media has declared that they sold out the Republican Party, then they won’t (compromise),”

Someone should go tell our dear President that leaders in the Congress ARE supposed to keep the opinions of their constituents in their minds, because that’s why they are there: to represent their constituencies.

“What matters is that all his constituencies or her constituencies are watching Fox News and listening to Rush (Limbaugh), and they’re going to pay a price if they’re seen as being too cozy with a Democratic president,” he stated.

Another interesting point to note is the fact that Fox news has been brought under the fire by Obama, when Republicans are often not happy with the way Fox News deals with Republican issues. They claim that Fox News is weak in regard to issues dealing with the Rightists.

Has FBI Given Immunity To The ‘Triggerman’ In Clinton-Email Scandal?

The inconsistencies surrounding Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, and particularly her email scandal keep growing exponentially, by the passing minute. Every new discovery reveals the extent of corruption that was involved in attempts to conceal the illegalities committed by Clinton and her staff during her tenure as secretary of state. And the deeper one digs, the worse the situation seems.

In a ground breaking report, The New York Times has recently revealed that the tech expert who deleted the controversial emails of the Democratic Nominee, in blatant violation of the orders of the Congress, was afforded immunity by the Justice Department while inquiring into this matter.

As per the report, Paul Combetta, the tech expert, was an employee of Platte River Networks in Colorado at the time when the company was handling Clinton’s email servers.

The FBI documents reveal that originally Combetta had denied deleting the controversial emails in his testimony in February, whereas, in May he confessed to deleting the emails using a software program called BleachBit, which eliminates any possibility of retrieval of data.

Therefore, it comes as no surprise that the content of the report is met with strong disapproval. Watch this interview for Fox News by Trey Gowdy, Chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi regarding this news below:

“If the FBI and the Department of Justice gave this witness transactional immunity, it is tantamount to giving the triggerman immunity in a robbery case,” the former prosecutor said. “It looks like they gave immunity to the very person you would most want to prosecute.”

“You don’t give immunity to the person who actually robbed the bank,” he said. “You may want to give it to the getaway driver. You may want to give it to the person who helped them count the money afterwards, but you don’t give immunity to the person who walked in and robbed the bank. That ain’t that complicated, but that’s apparently what the FBI did.”

However, what is more disappointing and aggrieving than the email scandal itself, is the fact the perpetrators involved are being given impunity by the very departments who are responsible for bringing them to justice i.e. the Justice Department and the FBI.

What treatment do you think Combetta deserves? Let us know by following us on Facebook and Twitter? Let us know what you think of Gowdy’s views on the issue by commenting below!

President Obama Gets A Taste Of His Own Veto

The US House of Representatives unanimously assented to House Resolution 3815, a bill aimed at addressing acts of terrorism, and particularly the catastrophe of 9/11.

The House Resolution 3815, titled “Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act” or JASTA, enables U.S. citizen to sue foreign countries on account of their connection or contribution in any act of terrorism committed in US jurisdiction, The New York Times reports.

The significance of JASTA can be truly understood in light of the fact that up until now, foreign countries have enjoyed protection from legal actions due to the internationally prevailing legal concept of ‘sovereign immunity,’ which is accorded to them in the U.S. through a 1976 statute. However, the operation of JASTA will now create a marked deviation from this long standing law.

Allen B. West has noted that sovereign immunity has dominantly provided protection to Saudi Arabia, against any legal action on account of their connection with the tragedy of 9/11. It is important to note in this regard, 15 out of the 19 hijackers were found to be citizens of KSA.

Despite the opposition of this bill by President Obama, both houses of the Congress, have unanimously given assent to JASTA, therefore, effectively eliminating the chance of exercise of veto power by the President against this bill, which can be overridden by a two-third majority of both houses of the Congress i.e. House of Representatives and the Senate.

In response to JASTA, the Saudi government had threatened to liquidate their holdings in USA worth billions of dollar, if the bill comes into force. However, according to the New York Times many specialists are of the opinion that Saudi Arabia is only bluffing to pressurize the US to stop them from passing the law.

Perhaps the opposition on part of the US stems from their fear of the facts which may surface during these law suits.

Irrespective of that, the bill obtained unanimous support at the occasion of the 15th anniversary of the 9/11 tragedy, and it is a suitable commemoration for all those innocent souls who fell victim to this perverse act, and their loved ones who had to live without any avenue to avail recompense, justice or closure.

Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think of Congress’s measure to fight terrorism? Do you think it is unexpected that JASTA found unanimous support in both parts of the Congress? Let us know by commenting below!

WATCH: How Black Celeb’s Brutal Honesty Gets Obama and Hillary in Trouble

President Brack Obama has lost the support of another member of the African-American community, and this time it’s a celebrity. We are talking about the very popular former rap artist, and current music industry mogul, Sean “Puffy” Combs, aka Puff Daddy or P. Diddy.

Now, while this does not look good for Obama, it will potentially hurt his Democrat successor, Hillary Clinton and her campaign.

Combs stated, according to the Daily Caller, that black people “got a little bit shortchanged.” by Obama.
He said:

“My number one thing, though, to be honest, is black people. I feel like (the black community) put President Obama in the White House. When I look back, I just wanted more done for my people.”

“Because that’s the name of the game, this is politics,” he elaborated. “You put somebody in office you get in return the things that you care about for your communities. I think we got a little bit shortchanged.

“That’s not knocking the president,” he added quickly. “He’s done an excellent job, you know, but I think it’s time to turn up the heat because the black vote is going to decide who is the next president of the United States.”

You can watch the whole video here:

He also talked about Hillary Clinton in the interview, subtly warning her to not take the votes of African Americans for granted. He said,

“Hillary Clinton, you know, I hope she starts to directly talk to the black community. it really makes me feel, you know, almost hurt that our issues are not addressed and we’re such a big part of the voting bloc.”
“The heat has to be turned up so much that as a community we got to hold our vote,” Combs continued. “Don’t pacify yourself, really revolutionize the game. Make them come for our vote. It’s a whole different strategy but I think we need to hold our vote because I don’t believe any of them.”

While it is not likely he would vote for Trump, he wants to get it across to Hillary and team that the black people are not to be taken lightly, and that the democrats need to put some efforts into earning the votes of black people. He said,

“You can get the vote. It doesn’t have to be held that long. But you have to come get it. You have to bring something with it,”

Combs is a reasonable man, it seems. He’s not blindly giving away his vote. What that means is that Trump will get a fair chance while Combs makes his decision to vote, and his vote is not a done deal for the Democrats.
Will you be rationally taking your decision for the presidential vote or just giving it up to whoever you have previously supported? Let us know.

RIDICULOUS Yet HILLARY-OUS: Awkward Hillary Clinton confuses the Crowd!

Presidential candidate for the Democrats, Hillary Clinton can’t seem to make up her mind, making conflicting statements at a campaigning event. She was probably unnerved by arrival of her Conservatives opponent, Donald Trump in Mexico a few hours later.

As Breitbart reports, Hillary’s statements were so clashed, that at one point in her speech she was slamming Trump for calling military a “disaster”, but at another instance, she admitted that the United States forces needed to be “modernized”.

And her speech kept getting more and more awkward as she repeatedly seemed to be supporting a third term for President Barrack Obama, highlighting his so-called accomplishments. Like people present in the crowd didn’t know what Obama’s government was actually about.

Doesn’t make sense at all.

Moreover, she also tried to criticize Trump’s visit to Mexico.

“It certainly takes more than trying to make up for a year of insults and insinuations by dropping in on our neighbors for a few hours and then flying home again,” she said. “That is not how it works.”

Well, she can say what she likes, because Trump’s visit was a success. So much so, that the Mexican president reportedly conceded to several points made by Trump. Might I add, this isn’t going to be his last trip to amass such a huge success. Hillary should probably anticipate more of these, so that she isn’t caught off-guard, not knowing how to react on these occasions. Preparation would save her a lot of embarrassment.

Hillary herself made numerous foreign trips during her time as secretary of state, and none of them were as successful as Trump’s visit to Mexico. She should probably take a deep breath to let that sink in.
Nevertheless, Hillary Clinton’s cognitive abilities were probably not up to the mark while she was making the speech, because all she communicated to the masses was confusion. Or maybe her health was deteriorating again. Or maybe both were happening at the same time.

Whatever it was, all it did was make Hillary look bad.

What do you think about this? Do share with us!